The strong voice of a great community
October, 2008

Back to Index

 
Ontario Acts On Goudge Recommendations 

 

     McGuinty Government Commits To A Stronger, More Accountable Coroners System

 

     TORONTO, Oct. 23 /CNW/ -

 

     NEWS

 

     Ontario's death investigation system would be stronger, more accountable

and provide for greater oversight and transparency under proposed legislation

introduced by Community Safety and Correctional Services Minister Rick

Bartolucci today. Highlights of the bill include a new oversight council,

complaints committee and a provincial forensic pathology service.

     The proposed legislation addresses all the recommended legislative

amendments in the report of the Honourable Justice Stephen Goudge's Inquiry

into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario. This includes amendments to the

Coroners Act that would establish a framework to strengthen the death

investigation system in Ontario.

     The new death investigation oversight council, made up of experts from

the medical, legal and government communities, would oversee the work of the

chief coroner and chief forensic pathologist to ensure the quality of the

system.

     The Ontario Forensic Pathology Service recognizes the complex and

important role forensic pathology plays in death investigations. The new

service will centralize forensic pathology under the chief forensic

pathologist, ensuring consistent, high-quality standards for forensic

pathology across the province.

 

     Other key provisions of the legislation include:

     -  A registry of pathologists approved to conduct autopsies in Ontario

     -  An improved complaints system overseen by the oversight council

     -  Improved services to northern, First Nations and remote communities.

 

     QUOTES

 

     "Commissioner Goudge gave us the roadmap to a stronger more accountable

death investigation system. This legislation takes us a long way down that

road. If passed, it would ensure we have the checks and balances in place to

prevent a similar tragedy in the future," said Community Safety and

Correctional Services Minister Rick Bartolucci

(http://www.mcscs.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about_min/bio.html).

 

     "This legislation would provide us the framework we need to truly

revitalize the system, and to help us build on the work we've already done to

earn back the trust of the people of Ontario," said Ontario's Chief Coroner

Dr. Andrew McCallum (http://webx.newswire.ca/click/?id=2e478d1bd6e0ea3).

 

     "By recognizing the importance of a professional forensic pathology

service, this legislation would help us to take the next step towards

delivering the consistent high quality service the people of Ontario deserve,"

said Ontario's Chief Forensic Pathologist Dr. Michael Pollanen.

 

     QUICK FACTS

 

     -  Ontario's coroners investigate approximately 20,000 deaths every year.

 

     -  Approximately 7,000 of those investigations require a post-mortem

        examination by a pathologist.

 

     -  The Coroners Act has not been significantly updated since the 1970s.

 

     LEARN MORE

 

     Learn more about Ontario's coroners

(http://webx.newswire.ca/click/?id=7493768864254bc).

 

     Read Justice Goudge's report and recommendations

(http://www.goudgeinquiry.ca/).

 

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                       ontario.ca/safety-news

                                                       Disponible en français

 

 

     BACKGROUNDER

     -------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

              STRENGTHENING ONTARIO'S DEATH INVESTIGATION SYSTEM

 

     Proposed new legislation would, if passed, amend the Coroners Act to

improve oversight, accountability and quality assurance within Ontario's death

investigation system. The proposed changes respond to recommendations made by

the Honourable Justice Stephen Goudge following his Inquiry into Pediatric

Forensic Pathology in Ontario.

 

     Key changes under the new legislation would include:

 

     ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT

 

     Proposed changes in the legislation would make it easier for the public

to understand how the death investigation system works and would make the

system itself more accessible, transparent and accountable.

     A new death investigation oversight council would be created to oversee

the work of the chief coroner and the chief forensic pathologist. This is in

response to Commissioner Goudge's recommendations that an independent

oversight mechanism be established to oversee Ontario's death investigation

system. The council will ensure that the chief coroner and chief forensic

pathologist are held accountable for the quality of death investigations in

Ontario.

     Ontario's Lieutenant Governor would appoint members of the oversight

council which would include representatives from the judicial, medical, and

government communities and as such would bring specialized expertise to advise

and oversee the chief coroner and chief forensic pathologist.

 

     STRENGTHENING THE COMPLAINTS PROCESS

 

     A new complaints committee would be established that would report to the

oversight council. The committee would track complaints made about the

handling of a particular death investigation or about the conduct of a coroner

or pathologist during an investigation.

     In general terms, complaints concerning the medical roles of coroners and

pathologists would be directed to the College of Physicians and Surgeons,

while complaints related to the non-medical roles of coroners and pathologists

(e.g., providing evidence in criminal proceedings) would be directed to the

chief coroner and chief forensic pathologist respectively.

     The committee would ensure the chief coroner and chief forensic

pathologist respond to complaints quickly and thoroughly. If a complainant is

not satisfied with the response provided by the chief coroner or the chief

forensic pathologist, the complaints committee has the authority to review the

complaint. The committee would also review any complaints against the chief

coroner and the chief forensic pathologist.

 

     ENSURING HIGH-QUALITY FORENSIC PATHOLOGY SERVICES

 

     In his report, Commissioner Goudge identified the vital role that

forensic pathology plays in Ontario's death investigation system. He made

several recommendations directed at improving the oversight of forensic

pathologists, defining their roles and ensuring quality within the system.

These recommendations are addressed in the proposed legislation.

 

     Roles and Responsibilities

 

     The chief forensic pathologist would be established in law as the head of

forensic pathology in the province. This would allow him or her to ensure the

quality and consistency of services being provided by forensic pathologists

across the province. Currently the chief forensic pathologist does not have

this legislated responsibility.

 

     Forensic Pathology Service

 

     A new Forensic Pathology Service would be created reporting to the chief

forensic pathologist. The new service would bring all of the province's

forensic pathology services under one umbrella to ensure consistency,

accountability and oversight. Currently, the province's forensic pathology

services are decentralized and run by regional forensic pathology units and

other hospital facilities where autopsies are performed.

 

     Registry of Pathologists

 

     A registry of pathologists authorized to perform post-mortem examinations

would be created and maintained by the chief forensic pathologist. This would

ensure that all pathologists providing services in Ontario are appropriately

qualified and experienced and have met the strict quality requirement set out

by the chief forensic pathologist.

 

     MAKING ONTARIO SAFER

 

     The chief coroner has a responsibility to protect public safety, and

needs to be given the clear authority to share information for this purpose.

Providing the chief coroner with authority to decide when it is appropriate to

share information to advance public safety will help coroners to protect the

public by preventing similar deaths. In such cases, the coroner would make

every effort to protect privacy by withholding identifying information where

possible.

     The current legislation allows the coroner to release the results of

death investigations only to family members of the deceased, but does not

allow the coroner to release the results to other groups or to the public.

     In some cases, the coroner has a need to share information when not doing

so would put the public at significant risk. For example, if widely used

medical equipment were faulty and caused a death, the public would need to be

informed.

 

     ENSURING AN INDEPENDENT DEATH INVESTIGATION SYSTEM

 

     The intent of the proposed legislation is to build a stronger death

investigation system based on the principles of professionalism and

accountability. Under such a system, it is the Office of the Chief Coroner who

has the expertise and experience needed to determine if an inquest should be

held. Decisions on inquests can undergo three levels of review within the

Office of the Chief Coroner: local investigating coroner; regional supervising

coroner; and the chief coroner.

     If the minister made a decision contrary to the chief coroner's, it would

be inconsistent with the arm's-length relationship between the Office of the

Chief Coroner and government. For this reason, the proposed legislation would

remove the power of the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

to call an inquest.

     The chief coroner's decision regarding an inquest could still be the

subject of judicial review, if there was a desire to appeal his or her ruling.

Under this proposed change, by removing any potential for political

intervention, the final decision is based on science.

 

     FOCUSING RESOURCES ON PUBLIC SAFETY

 

     All deaths of adult inmates in correctional institutions are, and will

continue to be, thoroughly investigated by a coroner who is able to make

recommendations to prevent similar deaths. Currently, a coroner must hold an

inquest into all such deaths. Where the initial investigation determines that

a death in custody was by natural causes, the resulting inquest rarely

provides meaningful recommendations to improve public or inmate safety.

     Under the new legislation, a death by natural causes in an adult

correctional facility would no longer be the subject of a mandatory inquest. A

coroner would still be able to call an inquest in such cases if he or she

believes an inquest will lead to improvements in public safety.

     This change would allow coroners to focus on those complex cases where an

inquest could result in meaningful recommendations to make Ontario safer.

 

     IMPROVING SERVICES TO NORTHERN, FIRST NATIONS AND REMOTE COMMUNITIES

 

     All Ontarians deserve high-quality services and that includes death

investigations. In his report, Commissioner Goudge recognized that delivering

this service is challenging in some areas of the province. The current

shortage of doctors in northern, First Nations, and remote communities results

in long response times in the event of a death and sometimes coroners are

unable to attend a death scene at all.

     As recommended by Commissioner Goudge, the new legislation would provide

for the appointment of individuals other than medical doctors or police

officers to perform coroner's duties. If passed, this amendment will give

coroners the flexibility to meet local needs and improve service to northern

and remote communities. However, the final decision as to whether or not an

inquest is required would continue to rest with the Office of the Chief

Coroner.

 

     DEFINING THE PURPOSE OF DEATH INVESTIGATIONS

 

     It is not always clear to the public what the purpose of a death

investigation is and this can cause confusion while the investigation is

underway. The proposed new legislation would establish in law for the first

time the reasons why a death investigation is undertaken.

 

     Each investigation sets out to answer five basic questions about a death:

     -  Who died?

     -  How did they die?

     -  When did they die?

     -  Where did they die?

     -  By what means did they die?

 

     The results of an investigation are used to determine whether

recommendations are needed to prevent similar deaths or whether the death

requires the additional public scrutiny of an inquest.

     An inquest is a public hearing held under the authority of the Coroners

Act for the purpose of presenting evidence to a jury of five members of the

community in which a person died. After hearing the evidence and other matters

relevant to the circumstances of the death, the jury must answer the above

five questions. They also may make recommendations based on evidence heard

that if implemented, might avoid deaths in similar circumstances.