|
|
The Greek Language and society with the Crypto-Christians of the South East of Pontos (Black Sea Coast ).
Theofanis Malkidis Lecturer Democritus University of Thrace
1.
Introduction.
Crypto-Christians
can be met in Pontos (Black Sea) since 1650 due to the fanatism of certain
"Derembeys" in the
period during which the Othoman Empire is parted into "Dembereilics"
that is, into feuds or themas. [1] The
head of those areas, in many cases, showed exceedingly high fanatism,
which was practised with oppression to Christians and forced them to
become Muslims. The early attempts towards the islamization of the Pontos
Greek population first appears at the Ofis region, [2]
followed by the Surmena and Argyropolis, Ionia and others. Publicly the
Christians appeared in a Muslim appearance and in public took part in
Islamic rituals as if they were genuine Muslsims but at the same time
they could be found to places where under covey priests held
liturgies and all other mysteries of the Christian Orthodox creed.
The Crypto-Christians evaded matchmakings to Muslims on many
pretexts and this way matrimonies went on among them. This lasted till
February 1856 when pressed by the European powers the Sultan signed the
"Hati-Humayium" by which any Ottoman Empire citizen was allowed
to change his/her creed and be a Christian again, in May 1856. The
Crypto-Christians are also called “Klostoi” was the guard of the
Italian Consulate of Trapezous town Pehlil Tekioglou. Since 1856 to 1910
when this policy changed with the coming of the Neo-Turks the Panislamic
policy- the whole lot of the
Crypto-Christians came to light when whole villages came back to
Christianity. 2.The
changes in the Muslim state and Crypto-Christians.
2.1.
The Tanzimat
The
period of great changes in the Ottoman State "the Tanzimat [3]
period" got started by the Sultan Abdul Medjit (1839-1861) with his
"Act" Hati Sherif in the year 1839 [4]
and was ratified and expanded by the Hati Humayim act in 1856. [5]
This period expands beyond the administration
time of Abdul Hamit B'
(1876-1909). The sequences of those reforms are closely connected with
economy, the increase of transactions with Europe, more intense
penetration of Western business firms, declination of local produce a
re-organization of agricultural produce which might secured the survival
of the empire [6]
itself as well as the political economical and social environment
especially of the non-Muslim populations. That's where the most serious
repercussion of reform lies which constitute the future determined social
developments. The Crypto-Christians problem is one of those directly
connected with the Greek-Turk
relations. 2.2.
Hati Sheriff.
Hati Sheriff, in the creation of which Moustaffa Ressit Pasha
greatly contributed, minister of Foreign Affairs and six times great
Vesier, co-ordinated in such a way that
would satisfy both the conservative Muslims as well as the liberals. The
table of privileges that was issued on 21 October / 3 November 1839
contained the following points of privileges; -
Warranty of life assurance, honesty and property on all subjects. -
Order on the fixing and revenues payment. -
Arrangement [7]
of enlistment and military duties in general. Those
privileges should come in action for the followers of any creed in the
same way irrespective religious beliefs formally,
[8]
but at the same time it made no mention in explicit way equality among
Muslims and non Muslims. [9] The difference in taxation with the "haratsi"
the capita impost and other rates and duties at times imposed still went
on existing for the former with the exception of the "capita
impost" in May 1855 the path was paved for a compulsory enrolment of
all non-Muslim citizens of the empire, which from one point of view it was
considered a threat for the Muslims who believed that it was only them who
had the right to carry arms or be armed whilst for Christians might change
the up to then status of redemption of military duty. Therefore this
section of the reforms would not be applied and the pre-existing state of
things would keep on and the Christians pay off a special tax of
redemption. [10]
But the issue of this new act was not presumptively accept its application
either, because the Muslim population reacted to the better welfare of
Christians as much from the political view as well as in a materialistic
way, or economically. In the capital city Constantinople and still more in
the big cities of the state like Andrianopolis, Smyrna, Caesarea or Ikonio.
Assassinations took place in 1840-1842 against Christians. Prominences of
power in local areas quite often refused to make use of the reforms
provided and as a reaction to this there were forced islamizations. In
Caesarea three solid villages were forced to abandon their creed during
that period and part of the above population chose cryptochristianism
preserving both creed and ancestry. Preservation of morals, traditions and
cultural inheritance were some of the defence measures taken towards this
peculiar and painful situation they were met with.
[11]
In the year 1843 a Constantinople Armenian, who had turned to Islam paid
for "death penalty" his return to Christianity.[12]
The Ottoman authorities felt the pressure exerted on by the European
powers in relation to the re-iteration of actions like this but it did its
best to evade the inviolable Muslim law to impose death penalty for those
who apostate from Islam. [13] 2.3.
Hati Humayun.
The
Hati Humayun of 6/18 February 1856 was issued after pressure exerted by
the European powers which aimed at the establishment of equal rights to
the Christians of the Ottoman Empire. [14] In this way they aimed at depriving the Russians of
mixing up with the home affairs of the Ottoman state, taking advantage of
the offer of protection to Christian populations and particularly the
Grecians by granting them the Hati Humayun all Christians obtained equal
rights with Muslims as much on the
religious field as on the legal one. On this Sultans emphatically said: «my
heart makes no exception between the slave of my empire. Rights and
privileges will equally be shared with no distinction to all with no
exception».[15]
In places and quarters of towns and villages with purely Greek- Christian
schools were opened, free religious worship was granted to exert
their religious duties into and outside places of worship and what is the
most important of all the change of religion [16]
was safeguarded, the community self- government, when the Ottoman state,
ratifies the National and General Regulations of the Patriarchy, which
will be the Constitution chart of the Orthodox Church till 1923. Of great
value is the opinion of the German clergyman H. Gentzer on the Greek
communities of Minor Asia for the period after 1836. In Minor Asia the
Greeks are making an unexpected progress. They grow in number quickly
because there are a lot of children in every family. They move from place
to place all the time. At first a grocer will
migrate. Then some families will move there too. A teacher follows,
a church is erected, a priest is placed soon a new Greek community is set
up. [17] The example of Amissos (Samsounta) )is most
characteristic. Until 1860 Amissos was only a small village of 4,000
inhabitants. But within 50 years became the biggest and busiest port with
a population of 40,000 people of which 2/3 of them were Greek.
[18]
Since 1856 till the official recognition of Kappadocia and Pontos
Crypto-Christians in the year 1911 by the authorities, there were several
sources about the Crypto-Christians with the most characteristic of P.S.
Sideropoulos or Pehlil, who unveiled himself to his boss the Italian
Consul Fabri. [19]
Since 1856 till the official recognition of Kappadocia and Pontos
Crypto-Christians in the year 1991 by the authorities, there are several
sources about the Crypto-Christians with the most characteristic of P. S.
Sideropoulos. On May 14th to 1856 Sideropoulos was finally recognized as
Christian [20] by the Ottoman authorities. This news brought about
new dates in the place and on July 15th 1857. 1590 representatives of
Crypto-Christians congregated at the church of Theoskepastos in Trapezous,
after a memorandum to the Sublime Port, the ambassadors of the European
powers and the Ecumenical Patriarchy. [21]
An account of the British sub-counsul A. Stevens in 1857 addressed
to the British ambassador Stanford about the Kromni district made a report
that in 55 villages 9,535 Muslims were sensured 17,260 Crypto-Christians
and 28,960 Christian Greeks. Gervassios the Sevastia bishop then referring
to the Crypto-Christians of Minor Asia says that after a European
interventions there in the year 1858, 25,000 of them confessed publicly
their Christian creed. [22]
The fact of this religious public turn to Christianity of their subjects
frightened the Ottoman authority which followed the developments made them
feel most worried.
As a means of hindrance to this climate in the official lists
besides the Christian name of the recognized former Crypto-Christian, the
distinct note was also added «Tenessour Roum» meaning "apostate,
denier or creed". Christians who were so marked were normally
enlisted and had to undergo the corresponding added sufferings. Their
children were not allowed to inherit their parents' properties who as
Crypto-Christians officially bore a Turkish name a fact that was rightly
excused by the Islamic jurisdiction which prohibits any transmission of
heir from Muslims to Christians. [23]
The proceedings were implemented with the aim of barring the trend of
Christians returning to their former creed but also to safeguard domestic
income. [24] The
period after 1869 is characterized by ever increasing persecutions of the
late Crypto-Christians, whilst there were some who tried to get a Russian
citizenship aiming at getting the protection provided by the adjacent
country. In the year 1876 there will be act of violations of Ponto's
Turkish population which keeps on for long. 3.
The 1876 Ottoman Constitution and the Crypto-Christians.
The
reforms that took place in the Ottoman state came to a peak in 1876
together with the preparations of the New Constitution by the Great Visier
Midhat Pasha the head of the Neo-Turk movement. During this period the
Otoman state took the shape of a Constitutional monarchy, but soon Abdul
Hamit B' abolished the Parliament. It was only shortly before the
Young-Turk movement in 1908 that he was forced to grant his condescendence for
a new parliament assembly on July 23rd 1908. The constitution resulted
that equality of rights among all citizens will be declared for all
religions and it was then that Crypto-Christians of Kapadocia will freely
declare their creed. Those Greeks called Stavriotes, taking their origin
from "stavroti" village, led a double life for a great length of
time, Christian in private and Muslim in public. [25]At
Easter in 1877 300 Stavriotes families were bold enough to publicly
declare their Christian creed celebrating "Ressurection", in
church taking advantage of the constitution.
The 1876 constitution charter
was no longer in use and formally, nothing changed in their district,
People were able to send their children to the Greek orthodox school go to
church and come to matrimonial ceremonies. [26]
Until 1898 the Ottoman authorities took a mediocre imposture towards it
all but after the 1897 Greek-Turkish
war wild persecution broke out against Minor Asia Christians broke out
especially neighbouring Trapezous area. The Abdul Hamit "Kulturkampf"
cultural battle waving the panislamic flag did not prove to be free of
bloodshed. The Sultan put forth a plan towards an enforcement of the
Ottoman culture fomenting religious devotion to Islam. Studying at Greek
schools was banned, children born by non recognized Christian parents were
considered "bastards` illegitimate and of a great extent enlistment
was carried out. [27] 4.
Neo-Turks and the Crypto-Christian Question.
The
Neo-Turk movement first appeared in the Ottoman political field with the
issue of the magazines The interpreter of times (Tercuman-I ahwal), and
Picture of Thoughts (Tasvir-I- Efkar) with a basic aim was to radically
changing the operating structure of the Ottoman State. [28]
At its first fase of development of the Young-Turk movement there
were groups in it, with different objectives from those of the leading
group and the atmosphere in general which were expressed by the slogans
and the policy of a pan-islamic ottomanism, the Turkish nationalism and
modernization. Of them all very few agreed that Christians and Muslims
should have equal rights within a modern Muslim State. Some followers of a
Panislam ideal advocated for the islamization by force of the Christian
population and particularly the children's, a movement which met with the
approval of those living at the remotest
parts of the empire and away from the urban districts where
christians were a minority.
The islamization problem developed into a serious one for the
Patriarchy and Church in general, forcing its religious leadership to send
out ecclesiastical reports (takriria) to the Ottoman State with the aim to
explain the particular problems. [29]
As a political problem the Neo-Turks appeared in the decade of 1870
with the so-called Modern Ottoman party, a party of the liberal owners of
big farm properties and the small bourgeois class, which had just started
to come into being. With the bankruptcy of the Ottoman State in 1875 the
party mobilizing the people,
made the Sultan Abdul Hamit B' to appoint the Great Visier Midhat Pasha
who for all the mask of political liberalism and rights he wore he
amalgamated the non -Muslim subject- citizens with Islami and Turkish
ideology. The Neo-Turks will take shape with the establishment of their
club "Progress and Unity" at the Military Medical Academy of
Constantinople in 1889, but the climate of freedom of movements does not
last long, and its leading hierarchy will be persecuted and will gather
close together with each other around the "commision" Union and
Progress, in Paris (1897). The Union will play an important role in its
base. [30]
Taking advantage of the 1905 census and until 1907 and the 1908 revolt,
the situation was again led to tension concerning the Crypto-Christians
and Stavriotae demanding to be registered as Christians, a request which
was responded with acts violation and when the expected result did not
come with offers of offices. [31]
The 1908 Neo-Turk rise brought back the constitution and succeeded
in the Sultan's changing. It was something that was welcomed by
Greek-Christians and nationalities and religions of the state, as a hope,
but they soon realized that the Shauvinistic character of the movement as
it was planning the extermination of the non Muslims it was a period
characterized by seeming retreat of the Ottoman administration on the
relevant demands of Crypto-Christian's recognition. Stavriotae attempted
through memoranda to bring their demand again to action, but it took them
at least 2 or 3 more years before a tentative solution was given with the
acceptance of the Neo-Turkish side of the Crypto-Christianish problem and
the stavriotae insisted on being censured as Crypto-Christians. Although
the Neo-Turks spoke for reforms they were practically sauvinists. Turkish
is established as the official language and at school up to secondary
education will solely be Turkish the right to become M.P.'s had only those
who had good knowledge the official language and Osmanism was
proclaimed as national ideal which is formally the equality of all
citizens before the Sultan, but practically denied the existence of other
nationalities, trying to assimilate them by force. The U.S.S.R. world
history says that «the top stratums in their bourgeois class the
interests which defined the basic fondamentalization of the Neo-Turks
policy aimed, above all, at taking part in the profitable broker's
business neither for those stratums nor ever more for the feudal who, too,
affected at a large extent the Neo-Turks' policy, where radical changes
were necessary in the state and economic system. That's why the
Young-Turks main most aim was to hold their rebellion into legal and
constitutional frames to keep order all over the country, aiming this way
to crash the classical fight of the working class and the national
liberation movement of the Non-Turk populations».[32]
The French historians E. Dicault and M. Lheritier write that «modern
Turkey of 1907 was more nationalistic rather, than liberal. Ahmet Keza in
the Young-Turks gazette adopted the right of self-control, but this right
was also claimed mostly by the Turks ...».
[33]
The constitutional Ottoman empire, for all its declarations which affected
lots of democrats and combatants from various nationalities simply
continued the Sultan's policy, the reforms were not materialized nor
respect was shown towards minorities.
At the Young- Turks conference in Thessaloniki in 1911 decisions
were adopted which turned against every non-Muslim minority who lived
within the boundaries of the Ottoman State. «Turkey should eventually
become a Muslim country. The Mohammedan’s concept and power should keep
control all over the country. Any other religious propaganda should be
banned. The existence of the Empire depends on the forces and power of the
Neo-Turk party and the crashing of any other ideology antagonizing it. The
muslimization of peoples should be completed as soon as possible. Of
course, it is clear that it cannot be accomplished by convincing them and
that the only way is to use arms force. The feature of the empire should
remain Mohammedan’s and upon this we should see that Muslim laws and
decrees will be respected by all. The right of all other nationalities to
have their own organizations should be obliterated. Any form of
decentralization or self administration will be considered treason for the
Ottoman Empire Nationalities are elements of no value. They may be allowed
to keep their creed but not their language. Expanding the Turkish language
is one of the most basic principles for securing the Mohammedan’s
superiority and the assimilation of non Mohammedan
population». [34]The German ambassador in Athens A.Wangenheim
wrote to the German Chancellor of State F. Bulow what the Turk premier and
minister of defence, field Marshsal Sefrer Pasha, said about the new state
of being «The Turks have taken up an exterminating battle against the
Christians of the empire. Turkey is going to be their starting point where
the largest part of them and then outside Turkey, where there are centres
of resistance».[35]
Since the very beginning the Neo-Turks tried to crash down the
Crypto-Christians turn over movement and at the same time to give a strong
blow to the religious beliefs of the Greeks Nazim Bei, of the leading
members of the movement said to the Greek poet Argyropoulos «the Greek
feeling must for the sake of the salvation of Turkey to be diminished not
only at school but also anywhere it comes up». [36]The Turk ambassador Ahmed Reza used to say about
the Greeks of Minor Asia at that same period. «Modern Turkey wants to put
an end with the confusion of these 2 nations, that is the Greeks and Turks
became by the word Greek the whole lot of Christians is meant. He wants
the Greeks to understand that the Greeks of Turkey are Turks not Greeks.
The ecumenical Patriarchy should stop being the centre of Hellenism. The
Ottomans who are the only masters of their home will surely impose their
will on all the benevolent ones and with understanding ones but with a
greater stability than ever before». [37]
This programme was brought into action with the break out of World War I,
on all acts that dealt with the Christian nationalities of the Ottoman
state leading to a great rush of Islamization long before the compulsory
population exchange, [38]
which was agreed half a year ago according to the Lausanne treaty
on a 2 side agreement between Greece and Turkey (30/11/23).
[39] 5.
The present status of Crypto-Christians of the Pontos dialect speakers.
Until
the mass expulsion of the Greek population from Pontos,
[40]
Ionia and Thrace, Kappadocia - the muslimized - greekspeaking of
Pontos kept their touch with the Greek Christians live and lasting. In
1914 according to an official statistics of the
Ecumenical Patriarchy, entered in the Greek ministry of Foreign
affairs records, estimated that the Greek speaking Muslims came up to
190.000. [41]
The prior of St. John's convent Panaretos in his report to the Greek
Ministry of Foreign Affairs writes the following about the Greek speaking
people «They are Greeks who were forcedly islamized during the pitch
black centuries of slavery and even today adopt mohamedanism but their
mother tongue is Greek, are aware of their Greek origin, and islamized by
force keep it as a shrine and do not compromise with it by any means to
the alienation of them. Turkish is taught at school as for their women
speak greek more fluently. And this is in spite of the fact that they live
enclosed by a Turkish environment».[42]
But the expulsion of Greek populations (as well as Muslims) after
1923 and the upcoming mass crime of genocide,
[43]
left those people with no contact with either their Greek environment or
the church, with the only exception of those who migrated to
Constantinople, where they created strong Greek speaking communities which
kept and are still keeping their traditions and mainly the Pontos dialect.
In spite of the absence of contact the well planned policy of a forced
embodiment in the Turkish society reflected from the side of Greece [44]
those people still preserve elements, consciousness which are beginning to
be being sought for, since the last 70's when they took their share in the
big migration rush in great number from Turkey to the Western Europe.
There, they met with Greeks from Pontos region, immigrants, and gradually
their first contacts are restored, through their common changeable
throughout the centuries, language, customs and tradition, dances, songs
and other things. At the same time the contact of
Crypto-Christians-Greek speaking with the Pontians of Greece is
re-enforced through the effort of bringing again to life the Pontos
problem in all its dimensions in the Greek area and the organizing of
their first visits to Pontos.
Nowadays there are almost no Crypto-Christians in Turkey with the
sense of keeping creed. But there are families which were of weak
religious belief and stayed in Pontos area for various reasons. To-day
their (unknown) number of Greek speaking Muslims-Crypto-Christians,
pioneered by college youths, in their attempt to find answers about their
ancestors' culture history identity are leading a hard path of
self-determination and search of identity concerning the present
situation, about numerical data of Greek-speaking Crypto-Christians but
only presumptions can be made. So, at Sourmena, the capital of the
district consisting of 19 villages, 5 of them are purely populated by
Greek-speaking people to-day Mazera village was also Turgut Ozal's
birth-place with a descend of Adnan Kahfedji family the one who get the
inspiration of the reforms and claimed the knowledge of Pontos dialect and
who got killed under obscure conditions in a road accident. The Sourmena
Pontians, with special tendency to learning business and fishing, have got
a numerous settlement in Constantinople. The Galians district (ancient
Guliena) consisting of 18 villages and settlements. Half the population of
the district are local people islamized and the other half have
re-established themselves from the villages Kullish and Archangelos of
Surmena district in the 3d decade of the twentieth century. The
habitations of the people who deal with stock breeding are mostly mixed
and the Turkish language has most recently stared to be replacing the
Pontos dialect language which is not spoken by people, at least below 20.
The Tsa´kara
region (Kato-Chorion) is purely Greek-speaking and the last to have become
islamized (end of 19th century) with a sufficiently highly developed
religious feeling of Crypto-Christians. Lately its youth have been
affected by leftist ideas and a claim of self determination,
self-cognition and search of their own identity. The people there are
mostly stock-breeders whilst as many have migrated to Constantinople where
they have constituted a powerful federation, working as scientists,
businessmen, statesmen, for example from the "Sineck" village of
Katochorion the former president of Turkey Seudet Sunay drew his origin.
The Off district (ancient Offis region) consists of 49 villages,
completely Greek then, but nowadays only one the Evenkioy remains still
Greek-speaking. There the Muslim celebration of Ramadan, Triod called from
the Greek Triodion. [45]The majority of its inhabitants are Muslims and about
their identity mainly leftists mention
it but also a good number of islamists. The Offis inhabitants
mainly yeomen and stock breeders have astablished in Constantinople and
other cities large communities. The Greek-speaking writer Homar Assan from
Erenkroy has published the book "Pontos Culture" Pontos Culture
in plain Turkish and has greatly contributed to the identification seeking
of those people.[46]
References have been made even in a Turkish magazine which
emphatically says that «the traces of the orthodox tradition are obvious
and here everybody speaks Pontos-Greek. The Rum and Orthodox is clearly
seen».[47]
Ano Matsouka (upper Matsouka) consists of 8 villages located at the
Zygana pass with Hapsikoy at the very centre. It is about Greek -
Christian villages of which the greatest majority of its
population derives from Greek-speaking settles from Tonia district
that settlers there after 1924. Greek-speaking communities of Ano Matsouka
can be found to-day at Yalova, Gebdge and Constantinople itself. The Tonia
(the ancient Thoania) district consists of 18 villages 7 of which purely
Greek-speaking. The people of the surrounding area, still keep so many
elements of the Pontos Hellenes. While they are at the same time, renown
for their love to weapons and preserving the custom of the "vedette".
It is from Alexandrana village that the former minister A Sener derived
his origin whilst the inhabitants of the district still keep large
communities in Yalouz and Karamourseel, at Gemze, Bouyouk Tsakmese,
Constantinople and elsewhere. Conscious of its identity, which they
comparatively claim do possess some pioneering members of their youth
being affected by their left members. To
conclude with, what has to do with numerical data and given the Turkish
authority maliciousness towards a research of the national origination of
the great minorities in their country, [48]
as well as the obvious hindrances towards their national self-definition
it is too difficult that some precise evaluation as for the number of
Pontean Crypto-Christians existing to-day to be made.
[49]
Socially, the Pontos CryptoChristian-Greek speaking people used to
be and still remain conservative unit groups of people, with tight bonds
among them, family or relative ones - it still keeps on endogamy, as has
already been said and they are extremely resistant to any
changes attempted to be imposed on them. Such changes that are
imposed by the Turkish authorities aiming at the introduction of a unique
Turkish identity and language.
Nevertheless during the latest decades of years a feeling of some
kind of specific identity is ever increasing, accompanied by deeps of
mental and cultural rise. But even those attempts from the side of
youngsters, mainly from Pontos, to express in words or script texts their
Pontean dialect, history, the cultural identity of this people, are faced
with hat red by the Turkish authorities whilst the lives of Ponteans who
dare express their views are threatened.[50]
This oppression is accompanied by pseudo-scientific attempts
distorting the rich History of this people and their region, as the
official Turkish political line status that this historic nation is of
Turkish origin.
Concerning the language it seems that a large part of Islamized
Greek-speaking people of Pontos,particularly in the Trapezous district,
Tonia, Ofis, Sourmena, Matsouka as well as some Constantinople boroughs,
have preserved their Pontean dialect unchanged. So in those districts, the
language, illegal in Pontos and all other parts of the Turkish region that
consists a tenacious bond of identity, is kept alive. Of course there is
not a single school in Turkey where Ponteans will be able to learn,
promote, their language. Pontos youths - especially those coming from
inland - because of the fact that their families keep stuck to their own
language and do not know Turkish, they first come in contact with this
language at school and have to learn this language through hard teaching
methods. Even, in Primary schools there is a net of young pupils of
reliable informers that indict to their teachers. Pontean school-mates who
speak the Pontos language in private and whom it's their teacher's turn to
take them or even the police through some hard convincing methods. At
Junior and Senior High Schools the work of terrification is handed over to
racism and clans of fascists like the one of "grey wolves".
Under these terms Pontos students are excluded from Universities and
Colleges. Students of Pontos descendance who make an attempt to show their
Pontos origination and culture by means of printed matter - a magazine was
issued at the Trapezous University in 1999 - they run the danger of being
sentenced to imprisonment by the Turkish authorities. According to the
Turkish policy activation of youths and quite often of some political
standing, concerning their identity in Pontos, is included in the attempt
of re-birth of "Pontos Empire".[51]
As a continuation of this policy from the side of Turkey a demand
was made by the Turkish ministry of Foreign Affairs, to deport about 50
Greek-speaking students who came to Greece in search of their own
identity. [52] The cases of Redza Gildiz, Fethi Giultepe and Kara
Bayram deportation are the most well known and about which the principals
of Panteion University, Pontean societies, University teachers, citizens
active members of the Greek society were mobilized against it.
Because in an official standard at least, the Greek state does not
become activated on, the question of the Greek-speaking CryptoChristians,
it has been shown at the level of the Greek society,
either from the side of Pontian societies or non government
organizations. In particular, the Pontian associations through
presentations to Greek and Turkish as well as any power bearing centres
the problem has been made known to them of the Greek-speaking ones and the
oppression they suffer focusing their reports on the question of the
deportation demand of Pontians from Greece. And also the restrictions in
Turkey to-day, against freedom of Islamized Ponteans has been denounced by
a non- governmental organization «International Union for the Rights and
Liberation of Peoples» [53]
with a written memorandum to the Organization for the European security
and co-operation (O.E.S.C.) and also the Human Rights Bereaux of the U.N.O.
in Switzerland there was also a verbal intervention at 58th meeting of the
U.N.O. on the same subject to the committer for the Human Rights and by
the French non government «AMRAP - Movement against racism- for
friendship among peoples».[54]
The non government organization of the International Union for Liberation,
made a special statement - against the systematic attempts being made for
banishment of the Pontian dialect, as being the one nearest to the ancient
Greek, spoken to-day but also the persecutions against Pontian thinkers (intelllectual
people) like the writer Omer Assan. Describing this situation the
International Union for the Rights and Liberation of People expresses
their wish to insist on the problem of inexistence of freedom of speech of
Pontian people Turkey in to-day whilst that statement was also made to
give information on the conditions of life of its people as the
international community should know the situation. Furthermore as it has
been pointed out in the statements of the non-goverment Organizations, the
interventions towards the abolishment
of discriminations against that people, it all consists a step towards the
preservation of a live civilization that has enriched the whole of the
humanity. 6.
Conclusions
For
all 1839, 1856 reforms and 1876 constitution the problem, of
CryptoChristians will still be affecting the whole of Minor Asian Pontos
till 1923. Persecutions is the dominant feature for all the at times
intervals, due to domestic or world datas. After the outbreak of World War
I persecutions against Christians will become more intense by the Neo Turk
regisme of which "Stavriotae", the inhabitants of Mt Ak Dag,
were more severely to be tortured who through their forced islamization,
tried to avoid tortures. Bishop Gervassios states that out of 19629
soldiers, Greek Christians and Crypto-Christians of the district only
1.300 will survive. [55]
In Pontos, after the Russian army had retreated in the year 1916,
those recently declared their Christian creed will be tortured whilst
their enlistment to the Labour Batallions will be intensified. The first
World War was followed by the Greek-Turkish one which resulted an
re-animation of tension and persecutions. After the Lausanne Treaty and an
earlier agreement concerning an exchange of population became possible to
come to Greece only those who had officially turned to Christianity,
leaving in Turkey lots of Crypto-Christians. Nowadays that problem of
Greek-speaking Crypto-Christians is part of a constituent which has lately
become part of a talk between Greece, Turkey, Europe, U.S.A. and world
organizations. [56]Roughly
speaking there can be a statement to situations that are connected with
the contact of Greeks and particularly Pontian immigrants to western
European countries with Pontians from Turkey, visits that have been made
during the last years to Pontos, meeting one another and a mobilization
against the Turks' demand of
deportation of all Greek-speaking students settled in Greece. Anyway, that
last parameter resulted that the problem became known beyond the narrow
margins of a Pontian printed matter and be spread about to stratums of the
Greek, Turkish, Europe - and even American society which either ignored it
or went past it acknowledging it.
[1] Inaldjik X. Ottoman Empire (trans M. Kocolakis Athens-Alexandria 1997).[2] For the Pontos region we know that soon after the Trapezous besiege its most prominent families were forced to become islamized as well as a great number of youngsters. According to the Metropolitan of Trapezous, Chryssanthos' information, the islamization in Pontos was carried out in the period 1648-1687 by pressures exerted from the side of feudalists the Derembeys, as they were called mentioning the following «because of the Derembeys pression and sufferings and persecutions those from the Akompsios (Tshoroh) river up to Trapezous solid populations of Grecians the Rizaeon region inhabitants, Ofis, Surmena and Gimora were totally islamized. All Christians, being given the name Iskender...» Metropolite of Trapezous Chryssanthos. The church of Trapezous. Pontis archives. Estia Athens 1933, yet see Photiades K. The Minor Asia Islamization and the Pontis Crypto-Christians, Thessaloniki Kyriakides Brothers 1988 and of the same author Sources of History of the Crypto-Christian problem Thessaloniki, Kyriakides Bros, 1977. Andriotis “Crypto-Christian problems Thessaloniki”, 1974.[3] About Reforms, see Issawi C. “The Economic History of Turkey” Chicago, 1950, Owen R. The Middle East in the World Economy 1800-1914. London 1961, Baily E. British Policy and the Turkish Reform Movement. London 1942. Shaws-Shaw E. History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge 1977.[4] Evangelides T., The History of Trapezous. Thessaloniki, 1994 p. 199. Apostolides D.,History of the Pontos Hellenes. Thessaloniki, 1935 p.107, Millioris N. The Crypto-Christians. Athens 1962 p.23.[5] Lamsides , Pontos under the Turks. Pontos Archives (34) 1977-1978, p.60-61.[6] Bailey F., British Policy and the Turkish reform movement. A study in AngloTurkish relations, 1826-1853. New York 1970 p. 87.[7] Karykopoulos X., The International regime of the Economical Patriarchy. Athens 1979, p. 41.[8] Lewis B., The Emergence of Modern Turkey, Oxford Univercity Press, 1963, p.105.[9] Zervos I., The Hellenism of Pontos. Athens 1919, p.16.[10] Pavlides I., Pontos M. Asia History Pages, Thessaloniki 1958, p. 73.[11] Vacalopoulos A., A History of modern Hellenism, Thessaloniki 1961-1980 v.1, p.100.[12] Panaretos, Pontos through the Centuries. Drama 1927, p.67, Scalieris, Peoples and Races in Minor-Asia. Athens 1922, pp. 384-385.[13] Fotiades K., The M. Asia islamization and Pontos Crypto-Christians, Thessaloniki 1988, p. 227.[14] Petropoulos D.- Andreades E., Religious life in the provinces Ak Seraï- Gelvera, Athens 1971, p. 55.[15] Shaw S., The Jews of the Ottoman Empire and Turkish Republic. London 1991, p.156.[16] Apostolides D., History of Pontos Hellenism, Thessaloiki 1975, p.107.[17] Gelzer H., Gestliches und Weltiches. Leipzig 1900, p.230.[18] Bryer A., The Pontic revival and the New Greece. In the Hellenish and the 1st Greek war of Liberation Continuity and change. Salonica 1976, p.189.[19] Lamsides O.- Ioannides S., History of Trapezous and its surrounding area, statics. Konstantinople 1870, p.144.[20] Parcherides J., History of Kromni. Trapezous 1912, p.50, Fotiades K.: Islamization and the Crypto Christians offer to natio-religious battles. Thesaloniki 1974, p.29.[21] Chryssanthos, The Trapezous church. Athens 1924,[22] Gervassios (Soumelides Bishop of Sebastia), The stavriotae. Konstantinople 1919, p.52.[23] Valavanis G., Moder General History of Pontos. Athens 1925, p.270.[24] Economides D., Pontos and consequent Rights of the Hellines residing in it. Athens 1920, p. 76-77.[25] Gevassius p.60, Valavanis G. p.266.[26] Papadopoulos A., The under slavery Hellenism of the Asian Greece. Athens 1909, p.5.[27] Poulton H., Top Hot Grey Woft and crescent Turkish nationalism and the Turkish Republic. London 1997, p.84.[28] Concerning the Neo-Turks see Mardin S., Genessis of Ottoman Thought. Princeton 1962, where analytical presentation of the movement thought.[29] Takriria highlights of the Ecumenical Patriarchy addressed to the Diran about the Stavriotae and islamization. Konstantinople 1909, p.p.17-34.[30] Durant Peoples' Court. The Silecent Crime. The Armenian enocide. Athens 1988 prolog[31]
Papadopoulos A., The Islamization of Minor Asia and the Pontos
Kryptochristians. Athens 1909, p.5.
[32] The U.S.S.S.R. Academy of Science[33] Concerning the Young-Turks see Mardin S., Genesis of Ottoman Thought. Princeton 962, where analytical presentation of the movement thought.[34] Zarerand, E. United and independent Turan, Leiden 1971 p. 36-38[35] Fotiades, K., «The persecutions of Pontos Greeks» in Fotiades, K.- Charalambides M., Pontium People. A Wright to Memory. Athens, Gordios, 2003, 2nd edition, pp.31-97. and Fotiades, K. Sources of the history of CryptoChristians, Thessaloniki, Kyriakides Bros, 1997.[36] Rodas, M., The way German policy caused the destruction of Pontos Hellenism. Athens 1978 p.18[37] Rodakis, P., The Turkish nationalism, the Armenian genocide and the uprooting of Hellenism of the Minor Asia, Athens 1986, p.19. the Minor Asian curse.[38] Gavriilides, A. Pages of the bitter calamity of Pontos. Athens 1924, p.87. Balioulis, P. Pages of Pontos disaster. Athens 1957. Hrton, G. The Minor Asia curse. Athens 1982.[39]
Gregoriades, F.Division-Minor Asia. Athens 1971,v.2 p. 437.
Psiroukis, N.,The Minor Asia destruction. Athens 1973,
p. 208.[40] Koromila, M., The Greeks of the Black Sea from the Copper Era to he beggining of the 20th century. Athens, "Panorama" Cultural Club, 1991.[41] Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Greek archives A/1920. The Hellenism of Pontos, A report of Archimandrites Panaretos, p.12, and Skalieris, G. The Trapezous Empire, Athens 1921, p. 47.[42] Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Greek archives A/1920. The Hellenism of Pontos. A report of Archimandrites Panaretos, p.11.[43] See Fotiades K ., The genocide of Greeks of Pontos. 14 volumes, Thessaloniki, 2000-2005.[44] Since 1941 there requests concerning the restoration of «islamized Pontian Crypto-Christians to Greece» in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 1938-1941. Pontos refugees and various problems p.5. The request was not realized to aoid disturbances concerning the Greco-Turk relations.[45] Fotiades K. Sources of history for the Crypto-Christians problem. Thessaloniki. Kyriakides Bros 1997, p.14.[46] Omer Assan with studies in economics besides the Offis accent Pontean dialect fluently speaks modern Greek. An author who comes from a region of great islamic tradition became an active member of Turkish left resulting to undergo severe persecutions during the 1980's. His father happened to be both Coup d'Etat of 1971 and 1981. He was awarded the Ipektsi award for having contributed for the Greco-Turk friendship for his book that has been translated in Modern Greek too (Omer Assan: the Pontos Culture. Thessaloniki. Kyriakides Bros 1997) but him and his editor have been summoned in he past to face the Turkish courts. Particularly, when in 1996 his book was printed by the firm Belge, the book that writes down the language, cuisine, even some humorous stories from the Greek-speaking villages, he was regarded by some, that he belongs to an organized group from Greece, who mobilizes people on the purpose that they will detach part of Turkish Land, the book-edition was banned and they were accused by the attorney for "an insult on the face of Kemal". The Omer Assan book that was seized by the Turkish police was out in Thessaloniki of copies, in succeeding one another editions concerning the first written thing to remember in the most modern history on the question of the Pontean language speaking Crypto-Christians.[47] GullenA. Pontus Mussulmanari, Aktuel Istanbul 1992 p.p. 58-60.[48] See the work Minorities in Turkey (trans Kontos ), Athens, Infognomon, 2002.[49]
Omer Assan supports the idea that the Pontean is spoken in 60 villages
of Trapezous region most of which are lcated in the Ofis district and
that according to moderate estimations this dialect is spoken by
almost 300.000 people, Kathemerini newspaper 23/7/1999 .
[50] A typical example of this conduct from the side of the Turkish authorities is a teleoptical serial which was dramatized some time ago in Trapezous and in which an ex-service arrmy officer and a say teacher ejaculated allegation from one side that Ponteans are of Turkish discordance and from another side threats against Pontean people who claim their right to keep in touch with Ponteans in Greece. Furthermore Pontean Greek travellers to Pontos have to undergo strict controls and watching by the Turkish police authorities[51] Most recently the garrison commander of Kiutsuktsekmetze Konstantiople colonel Ali Gungur Ongore suports the idea that Greece trains youths with the prospect of reviving of the Greek Pontos. The Colonel speaking in a specially prepared day, on the subject: «Cyprus in the iron collar of the E.U.» said that 35 youths from the Black Sea region who support the "breaking apart" "the Greek Pontos are being trained in camps in Greece and that the sightseeing excursions in the Black Sea districts that are organized by Greece, aim at reviving the oracle of the Greek Pontos The subject had also been put forth or the Kerassous Millitary Commander Brigadier Baki Onurlubas speaking about secret Greek plans, on the Pontos problem. A few days after this notification, a great project of the subject was shown in the T.V. meanswhich resulted that the book was banned. "The Pontos Culture" by Omar Assan. The way this project was made and also the sources this problem got started gives an impression of search of threat. Something which is exclusively an army task. "Macedonia ews agency" 5/12/2002.[52] Mehmet Karadeniz is the first Muslim from Pontos who came to Greece in 1989. Founder of the internet a communication forum among Ponteans all over the world Karadeniz came to Greece in a procession seeking for his identity, since according to his proclamations "when you have a mother tongue which ever it may be you start seeking the reason why it is so. «I don't want to cause anybody any problem to any system. But when you press me not to express myself something must be done about it». (Kathimerini newspaper 23/7/1999.[53] Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Meeting on Human Dimension Rights, Warsaw, October 1998.[54] United Nations Economic and Social Council 24 February 1998 andUnited Nations Economic and Social Council 25 January 2002. Also see Charalambidis, M. The Pontian Question in the United Nations, Athens 2004.[55] Gervassios, op.cit. p.56[56]
See. International Union for Human Rights and Peoples Liberation,
non-governmental Organization, authorities by the U.N.O. filed at the
Warsaw session of the Organization or the Security and co-operation in
Europe. October 1998. In the statement under the title «Pontians: The
oppression of freedom of speech» mentioned the present situation of
Islamized Pontians in Turkey and the problems they meet with. See:
Graf V. Secretary.
|