Ombudsman has statutory
obligation and moral responsibility to citizens
By William
Doyle-Marshall
Residents of
four Scarborough communities –
L’Amoreaux, Woburn, Malvern and Rouge – are to be part of a very
specific outreach initiative by the City of Toronto’s Ombudsman Fiona
Crean. This is the first direct attempt for city residents to become aware
of the existence of the office so that they could make use of its
services. September is the starting time.
“An ombudsman is an
alternative to the courts. You can go to court and fight your battle,
assuming you have a lot of money and enough time to do that,” the
Ombudsman told members of the National Ethnic Press and Media Council at
their meeting earlier this month. “The ombudsman is a free service to
the citizenry that is an alternative, where it isn’t about right or
wrong. It is about trying to put you the citizen in the place that you
need to be in terms of redress,” she explained.
The Ombudsman investigates
complaints by individuals against the city’s agencies and or staff.
People are invited to call her office anytime for clarification,
information or referral because dealing with City Hall is very
complicated. Complaints are not dealt with up front to avoid staff abuse
of the Ombudsman’s office. However before a complaint can be lodged the
affected individual must first approach the department concerned. There
are two exceptions. When nobody answers your call, the Ombudsman considers
that a form of mal-administration and she will look into it. The other.
exception is where a group or individual is so marginalised or vulnerable
that it would be an absurdity to send them back through the red tape and
the bureaucracy.
“You can never undo what has
happened. You can only look at what is reasonable and to then look at how
did this happen in the first place,” Crean said.
The four areas were selected
based on data collected which showed the further out people live in the
city, the poorer they are. “So we looked at this and the importance of
getting to those communities and we of course looked at different data
sources to say: where do we start?”Crean emphasized.
Crean believes it is better to
go into a fewer number of communities and work more intimately, in greater
depth, to begin with and then over time work across the city. The
ombudsman valued the chance to meet with members of the council.
She admitted that the people who
come to her office tend to look like her; they are highly educated,
computer literate, live on the subway line and are home owners. They have
an absolute right to have their complaint heard, but Crean said she knows
the vast majority of residents of this city does not look like her; they
do not live downtown and are is not upwardly mobile economically etc.
“It is my view that if you are
a single parent working in Malvern, night shift– the last thing you
would be thinking about is frankly: what is the ombudsman?
Crean emphasized her statutory
obligation and moral responsibility to ensure that people across the city
know about her office. “I think of it a little bit like an insurance.
Hope you don’t need it but you need to know about it in the event you
do. And you can be sure that public servants aren’t going to invite the
resident to go to the ombudsman’s office if something has gone wrong,”
the Ombudsman continued.
Pausing to address cynics about
the role of her office the Ombudsman agreed that people are cynical for
good reason. “The flip side of that cynicism is actually about fear.
It’s actually about ‘there is no point doing anything because nobody
is going to help me. So it’s getting people to actually believe that we
actually can make a difference.”
The
Ombudsman could be contacted by telephone (416) 392 7062 and TTY 416 392
7100 or by email – ombuds@toronto.ca
|