Istanbul Greeks miss EU
train
Turkish laws that were meant to harmonise
with EU norms still fail toprotect the property of religious minorities
GEORGE GILSON
IN ISTANBUL
Members of a Greek Orthodox
family knock Easter eggs during the Orthodox Easter ceremony at St
George's Church in Istanbul on 5 May 2002. The city's dwindling Greek
Orthodox community views the church as
the sole pillar of spiritual and moral support
AS TURKEY steams towards the start of European Union Accession talks in
October, Istanbul's Greeks say the country's laws continue to discriminate
against minorities.
The 2,000-member community has complained bitterly that new laws
designed to protect the property rights of religious minorities have done
nothing to help them to retrieve hundreds of properties expropriated by
the state over several decades.
Members of the Greek minority charge that properties confiscated over
the years by the state's General Directorate of Foundations are being sold
off to third parties in order to prevent the dwindling community from
regaining their property under EU rules in the future.
Greeks claim that a new law due to be tabled in May continues to
discriminate against religious minorities. That view is shared by the
Turkey Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV), a non-governmental
organisation, which says the draft bill does not meet the EU's Copenhagen
criteria and demands that minorities at least be compensated for
confiscated properties. TESEV argues that the draft bill tramples on the
basic rights of ownership and of association, and that it unacceptably
allows the state to fire an entire board of directors of a foundation.
"You cannot take a community's property, just because the
community does not have enough people to create a governing body.
The state says that if you can't hold board elections, the real estate is
ungoverned, so the state declares it state-occupied (mazbut) and
grabs it," Dimitris Frangopoulos, the retired principal of Istanbul's
historic Zografeion Lyceum told the Athens News.
The most recent property seizure was that of a huge, decrepit wooden
structure that once served as an orphanage in the upscale resort of
Prinkipos island, the only property that belonged directly to the
Ecumenical Patriarchate. The Turkish supreme court revoked the title of
the patriarchate, claiming that in 1936 the orphanage foundation was
registered as owner, and not the patriarchate, which acquired title to the
land in 1902.
The state foundations' directorate took over the administration of the
enormous prime property in 1997, after the patriarchate tried to make a
deal to build a 300-room resort hotel there. The patriarchate is planning
an appeal to the European Court.
Foundations under siege
All of the property of the Greek communities of Istanbul - their
churches, monasteries, schools, community centres and other communal real
estate - are owned by minority foundations that fall under the authority
of the state's General Directorate of Foundations (GDF) in Ankara. For
decades the foundations have laboured under restrictive laws. A 1935 law
required the minorities to register all their foundation properties in the
land registry. Title to properties not registered then or acquired later
is not recognised, and most have been expropriated by the state.
In 1974, the Turkish supreme court ruled that foundations could not
acquire any real estate, a decision that blocked Greek pious foundations
from legally gaining title to real-estate donations or bequests from
faithful. Thus, properties bequeathed to Greek foundations from
1936 onward were seized by the state, and the wills of Greek donors were
annulled.
A 2003 law designed to harmonise Turkey's legislation with that of the
EU reversed the 1974 law, allowing non-Muslim foundations to acquire real
estate - though the reversal was not retroactive. Greek foundations
submitted 1,647 applications for the state to recognise their ownership of
as many pieces of Istanbul real properties. Of these, according to
Metropolitan Bishop Meliton of Philadelphia, who handled the matter on
behalf of the patriarchate, only 390 were initially recognised by the
state, while another 200 were recognised on appeal. "The law does not
effectively protect minority property rights. It recognises only property
declared in 1936," Meliton told the Athens News, referring to
the land registry law.
But even that law does not wholly protect the foundations that
complied. It allows the state to confiscate real estate if a foundation
has ceased the active pursuit of charitable activity. "I argued that
this is not applicable to non-Muslim foundations," law professor Ata
Sakmar, the attorney for the Ecumenical Patriarchate, told the Athens
News in an exclusive interview.
The patriarchate has coordinated the efforts to save the properties of
the Greek minority, which views the church as its sole pillar of spiritual
and moral support. Sakmar has marshalled legal arguments from as far
afield as the 1923 Lausanne Treaty, under which Greece and Turkey agreed
to protect minority foundations.
Indeed, under article 40 of the treaty, the recognised Greek minority
is granted the right to independently administer its own foundations. But
the provision remained a dead letter, and the state has systematically
intervened in the financial management of minority foundations and
regularly dissolves their governing boards.
Sakmar said that the chief of the Directorate of Foundations claims
that "the government is doing its best and that minorities are never
happy with what is given".
"I have to say that the reasons of refusal to register some lands
were correct," Sakmar continued, "because some of the properties
we applied for were already sold [by the state]. The legal way to take
them back is to go to court, if possible. Secondly, we applied to register
some properties which were supposed to be owned by the Greek foundations,
but we were not able to produce any evidence of such ownership. Almost
half of our applications were hopeless, because we could not prove - with
electricity or phone bills or tax receipts - that these properties were
used by the foundations," he said.
Sakmar says 45 foundations have been taken over by the state due to
lack of minority residents in the area. He notes that this is due largely
to the exodus of Greeks in 1964, when Turkey deported several thousands of
Greek citizens who had been living in Istanbul under a prior bilateral
agreement. "This is the biggest problem for Greeks: If they have all
the rights to acquire property and the state can take over the
administration, their rights are not guaranteed," he says.
EU finds fault
The European Commission's last report on Turkey's progress, in October
2004, noted the deficiencies of new laws as far as protecting minority
properties. "Religious foundations continue to be subject to the
interference of the Directorate-General for Foundations, which is able to
dissolve the foundations, seize their properties, dismiss the trustees
without a judicial decision and intervene in the management of their
assets and accountancy," read the report. The commission was also
critical of the new draft law.
The commission also found fault with a June 2004 law meant to address
the problems regarding the election of foundation boards, "which if
not held, or not held on time, can threaten their existence and lead to
the confiscation of their properties." Because minority communities
have died out in certain areas, the new law allowed for the enlargement of
the geographical area in which elections of a foundation board could be
held, but only to the adjacent province. Equally importantly, the
commission noted that the law left it to the discretion of local
authorities whether or not to enlarge the electoral district, leaving the
fate of a foundation to the whims of state functionaries.
The Greek community refused to hold board elections under the new law
so as to avoid setting a precedent.
The desperation and disgust of the aged teacher Frangopoulos reflects
that of the entire Greek minority. "I as a Greek want to donate my
property to a Greek pious foundation. What right do you have to take it
away? It belongs to the Greek community. This is my land! The era when we
said 'Slay me so that I can become a saint' is over," he says.
|